![]() I sold a 2008 MBP to a friend that only had 4 GB of RAM as well and a 7200 rpm HDD and it can handle Mavericks just fine. ![]() I can't see the speed of your processor being very relevant to whether the laptop continues to be compatible with future versions of OS X. Apart from that, mostly regular daily use of surfing, emailing, reading and writing papers. Sometimes I also do photos post-processing which includes using huge raw files. This also means, sometimes I need to run virtual machines (RAM!). ![]() I use this mac for coding (and compiling of course) when I'm not on my linux machine. In such case how long would I expand life time of my mac? Edit P.P.S As a side note, if I somehow manage to do both upgrades, i.e. Running out of space is not really an issue then. If I go with ssd, I would remove the optical drive and use its physical space for my current hard drive. If you had my mac, would you upgrade the ram or the hard disk? To add to dilemma, my laptop has sata2 while most solid state drives can shine with sata3 (correct me if this wrong). On the other hand, I read everywhere that ssd makes the computer much more responsive and this is the main reason I want an upgrade. Thus, accruing more memory would make sense. I know that ssd improves the boot and wake up time as well as data transfer rate, however, I suspect that with 4GB one bottleneck in my machine is page swamping. There is a similar question here, but it is not applicable to me since the OP is already having 8GB of ram. With this specification, if I have to update one and only one part of my machine, which of the following gives me better improvement of performance: 8 GB of ram vs. ![]() It has 4GB of memory and a 500 GB sata hard drive (5400 rpm). I have a 17" Macbook Pro, mid 2010, with a 2.66 GHz core i7.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |